Okay, here are the rules:
Post the first three sentences of your novel, novella, or whatever long-form work you're currently working on. People can then comment on your work, based strictly on those three sentences. You do not get to post four sentences, or five, or a whole chapter. You do not get to tell us anything else about your story. You don't get to allude to what's going to happen next. You get three sentences, period.
The idea is to approximate what a potential reader will see if he's browsing through random books in a book store, or on Amazon. If you haven't grabbed his attention after a few sentences, you've probably already lost him. Is this harsh? Yes. Welcome to novel-writing!
Each post in here should be either A) the first three sentences of your work, submitted without comment, or

a critique of someone else's submission. Please try to keep your own submissions in separate posts from your commentary on others' works, and please use separate posts for critiques of separate submissions. It should help make things easier to parse. Posting revisions of your opening sentences based on criticisms is also okay.
I'll post mine as well, to get this party jumpin'.
Posts
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
vis a tergo | Blog | Twitter | Blip.fm | Dropbox
vis a tergo | Blog | Twitter | Blip.fm | Dropbox
ElJeffe, I think, for me, it is too much setting/description, but that is because I am really, really particular. I almost wish we had a something setting us up as being in Alister's head from sentence one, so there is a context to the description/guards a bit sooner. The way it is now, I'm thinking "guards, sure, why do I care?"
Forged by Fate, March 5, 2013! (And it's on Goodreads!)
Forged by Fate, March 5, 2013! (And it's on Goodreads!)
The guard routine also seems pretty bland, which seems to be what you're going for (business as usual), but judging just on the first three sentence it makes it feel a little boring. I think you could cut the second sentence entirely without loss.
vis a tergo | Blog | Twitter | Blip.fm | Dropbox
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
Something like:
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
I think the new opening works better.
VP, same deal. You might also consider moving the first sentence to the beginning, because a bleeding dude is compelling to start with.
vis a tergo | Blog | Twitter | Blip.fm | Dropbox
Maddie: "I am not!"
Riley: "You're a marsupial!"
Maddie: "I am a placental mammal!"
Boo, Amalia, just putting up some stuff from later in your series that we can't read yet. So mean.
Jeffe I'd get rid of 'back' in the third sentence. I think with just neither guard looked or paused it flows a little better. I kind of liked the original version because I find it difficult to start a story with anything other than the characters name.
{Twitter, Everybody's doing it. }{My Rambling Blog}
vis a tergo | Blog | Twitter | Blip.fm | Dropbox
vis a tergo | Blog | Twitter | Blip.fm | Dropbox
The context of the three sentences makes me really curious, I just think you can make it a lot more active and make the imagery more evocative.
--
Thanks for the comments, guys! Starting with a line of dialogue as the first line of a book is something I've always been kind of wary of, but I think you're right and that it's a stronger place to start.
“Well, I don’t know about all that,” Frank says to himself as he sips his Coke and opens another granola bar, flinging the wrapper into the back seat.
Language is like a martial art; if you have a strong foundation, feel free to improvise.
But that's being nitpicky. I like the opening a lot and would read on.
The second sentence isn't as evocative as it could be. Show us instead of telling us.
I like the last line, though without the solid middle it kind of falls flat and reads as a bit of a cliche because of it.
jayxwolf.com || twit || fb || writing || ravelry || dA || g++
jayxwolf.com || twit || fb || writing || ravelry || dA || g++
{Twitter, Everybody's doing it. }{My Rambling Blog}
jayxwolf.com || twit || fb || writing || ravelry || dA || g++
The second sentence provides a hint of setting and the ships floating above ground pique my interest, but then the third sentence has me back in muddled-ville. Two lines of nine isn't exactly complex math, but it's forcing my brain to think about tiny details when I want to see a big picture.
Language is like a martial art; if you have a strong foundation, feel free to improvise.
Given that the sign is your opening line, I think you may be able to imbue it with some character that becomes indicative of the town. I'm just spitballing here since I don't know anything else, but instead of just 'small, handpainted' you could try and go with something more like A small, handcrafted sign half gone to rot and painted with a shaky hand read WELCOME TO LEWISTON. Suddenly your sign completely evokes a very specific idea of a town, and if the town is going to be a central "character" it may be worth setting up first and foremost.
I enjoy the bit of dialogue, but I also think you could combine the sheriff's hat-fanning with his opening line and suddenly you have a new third line all lined up.
Language is like a martial art; if you have a strong foundation, feel free to improvise.
{Twitter, Everybody's doing it. }{My Rambling Blog}
jayxwolf.com || twit || fb || writing || ravelry || dA || g++
I like your revision! nonliteral tons more unique.
I thought about putting the second sentence in with the third one mine, but it feels really crammed. I cut some description from the sign in another draft; I might rearrange. (Pretty sure the current draft is just getting to the overworked-into-putty phase, bleh.)
jayxwolf.com || twit || fb || writing || ravelry || dA || g++