Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.

King of the [Chat]

17980828485100

Posts

  • ThomamelasThomamelas Registered User regular
    314sbq0.jpg

    Pondering this as my new AV. With some chunk of this as my signature.

    My dear Wife, Mr. Davies will tell you what's happening here tonight. He's a good man and has done everything he can for me. I suppose there are some other good men here, too, only they don't seem to realize what they're doing. They're the ones I feel sorry for. 'Cause it'll be over for me in a little while, but they'll have to go on remembering for the rest of their lives. A man just naturally can't take the law into his own hands and hang people without hurtin' everybody in the world, 'cause then he's just not breaking one law but all laws. Law is a lot more than words you put in a book, or judges or lawyers or sheriffs you hire to carry it out. It's everything people ever have found out about justice and what's right and wrong. It's the very conscience of humanity. There can't be any such thing as civilization unless people have a conscience, because if people touch God anywhere, where is it except through their conscience? And what is anybody's conscience except a little piece of the conscience of all men that ever lived? I guess that's all I've got to say except kiss the babies for me and God bless you. Your husband, Donald."

    http://youtu.be/lljIrAfBzYs
    There's no living with a killing. There's no goin' back from one. Right or wrong, it's a brand... a brand sticks. There's no goin' back. Now you run on home to your mother and tell her... tell her everything's alright. And there aren't any more guns in the valley.
  • EchoEcho Per Aspera Ad Inferi Super Moderator, Moderator mod
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    Man Blasto is a TERRIBLE game

    Yeah but you can clip through like everything so it's hilarious

    LOL we are clearly both watching the same stream
  • ThomamelasThomamelas Registered User regular
    I love Henry Fonda. And he's perfect in that role. Not too much, not too little. No, he's just right in that monologue.
    There's no living with a killing. There's no goin' back from one. Right or wrong, it's a brand... a brand sticks. There's no goin' back. Now you run on home to your mother and tell her... tell her everything's alright. And there aren't any more guns in the valley.
  • ZombiemamboZombiemambo Registered User regular
    edited May 2013
    Man Blasto is a TERRIBLE game

    Yeah but you can clip through like everything so it's hilarious

    LOL we are clearly both watching the same stream

    I <3 watching PJ

    I was watching him play Blasto yesterday. I haven't watched anything aside from some SGnG attempts tonight
    Zombiemambo on
    JKKaAGp.png
  • EchoEcho Per Aspera Ad Inferi Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    Well, that sure was a special person in the healthcare thread.
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
    Is it wrong of me if I just basically ignore any criticism of superhero movies that is along the lines of "But that isn't how it was in the comic!"

    In many areas (say, regular novels) I can understand how taking a lot of artistic licence can be damaging.

    But comic books seem to me to be, by the very nature of comic books, made for reinterpretation.

    That is, there are approximately a hundred billion different takes in print circulation for virtually every character, with multiple and even contrasting origin stories for quite a few characters. Why is it when the silver screen enters the picture, suddenly we can't treat this as some version of Earth 45465 whatever?

    I mean, basically every superhero on Wikipedia has an "Other Versions" tab. Why is it when it is movies suddenly we have to be 100% accurate to some print run? (and then which print run?)

    @Jacobkosh
    @Thomamales

    I feel like you guys would have on hand ready examples where a character has a bunch of different origin stories, in the comic runs, and no one bats an eye.

    Or at least have something to say here
    This is all in relation to the number of people in the Iron Man 3 thread, and in real life, who have said to me "The movie was great but man the Mandarin/Extremis/Pepper Potts wasn't like the comic!"
  • ThomamelasThomamelas Registered User regular
    Arch wrote: »
    Is it wrong of me if I just basically ignore any criticism of superhero movies that is along the lines of "But that isn't how it was in the comic!"

    In many areas (say, regular novels) I can understand how taking a lot of artistic licence can be damaging.

    But comic books seem to me to be, by the very nature of comic books, made for reinterpretation.

    That is, there are approximately a hundred billion different takes in print circulation for virtually every character, with multiple and even contrasting origin stories for quite a few characters. Why is it when the silver screen enters the picture, suddenly we can't treat this as some version of Earth 45465 whatever?

    I mean, basically every superhero on Wikipedia has an "Other Versions" tab. Why is it when it is movies suddenly we have to be 100% accurate to some print run? (and then which print run?)

    @Jacobkosh
    @Thomamales

    I feel like you guys would have on hand ready examples where a character has a bunch of different origin stories, in the comic runs, and no one bats an eye.

    Or at least have something to say here
    This is all in relation to the number of people in the Iron Man 3 thread, and in real life, who have said to me "The movie was great but man the Mandarin/Extremis/Pepper Potts wasn't like the comic!"

    I generally ignore it. I may be willing to listen to criticism about violations of the spirit. Like if they did a Superman movie where he was a heartless killing machine, I might listen to that. But small detail shit should be ignored.
    And honestly, I liked what they did with The Mandarin. I have no idea how else you bring that character to the screen and not end up with something where it doesn't feel awkwardly racist.
    There's no living with a killing. There's no goin' back from one. Right or wrong, it's a brand... a brand sticks. There's no goin' back. Now you run on home to your mother and tell her... tell her everything's alright. And there aren't any more guns in the valley.
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
    But didn't they do a print run of Superman where he became a heartless killing machine?
    Also, isn't that the plot to Injustice?

    not disagreeing that these things do kind of violate the core character, but I am at least being snarky
  • STATE OF THE ART ROBOTSTATE OF THE ART ROBOT Registered User regular
    Donkey Kong Country is a hard game.
  • japanjapan Registered User regular
    Hah, we were just talking about this.

    Part of it comes from the fixation Hollywood has with not changing anything without "rebooting" and re-telling the origin story.
  • STATE OF THE ART ROBOTSTATE OF THE ART ROBOT Registered User regular
    Coworker and I just lost like 11 lives to Mine Cart Carnage.
  • japanjapan Registered User regular
    Also it is always interesting driving through the motorsport belt.

    We have passed a McLaren, a fleet of Aston Martin Racing trucks, and somebody's meticulously rally prepped Escort RS2000.
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
    japan wrote: »
    Hah, we were just talking about this.

    Part of it comes from the fixation Hollywood has with not changing anything without "rebooting" and re-telling the origin story.

    It is a difficult place to be- the desire to tell an interesting story with a set of characters balanced with the need to explain who they are
  • JacobkoshJacobkosh Gamble a stamp! I can show you how to be a real man!Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    @Arch it's certainly a valid criticism if the comic did it better. which isn't a guarantee or anything, I have certainly welcomed a lot of how these recent movies have cleaned up and focused on the core elements of these characters that have sometimes been lost under years of cruft.

    (Downey's Iron Man, for instance, has kind of become the new default characterization for that character, who in the past was often kind of murkily-characterized (and I say that as a fan, it was the first comic I ever bought).)

    It's also just kind of annoying when an element is ported from the comics but changed so much in a game of creative Telephone that the end product leaves me feeling that they'd have done better just doing something original instead. If you want to use the name of say, a villain, but don't care for his powers, his origin, his appearance, his personality, etc etc etc....what on earth made that character the right choice in the first place instead of another, completely different one?
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
    I guess I can understand that, Jake.

    I agree that Downey's Iron Man (like Fury's Jackson...wait shit) is the new default. Iron Man/Stark has always been tied for my favorite super (with spider man), so I have been in fan heaven the last few years.

    What are some examples where you think films went too far with a character? What about a comic that reinvented someone so much that they would have been better making their own? Are there any?
    How did you feel about the Mandarin etc etc
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    Just made a shopping list for the way home to make mothers day breakfast for the lady, hopefully I can have time to prepare it before she wakes up.
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
    japan wrote: »
    Arch wrote: »
    japan wrote: »
    Hah, we were just talking about this.

    Part of it comes from the fixation Hollywood has with not changing anything without "rebooting" and re-telling the origin story.

    It is a difficult place to be- the desire to tell an interesting story with a set of characters balanced with the need to explain who they are

    The thing is it so often isn't necessary. Like, Spiderman has been rebooted with a new origin story film about three times in the last few years.

    Everybody knows who Spiderman is. They should just do the Bond thing of telling a Spiderman story without acknowledging changes in actor or whatever.

    I hope we get to that level of cultural Zeitgeist with superheros soon
  • ElldrenElldren Registered User regular
    rewrites

    avface
  • evilbobevilbob Registered User regular
    So the new Star Trek movie is really good.
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    So EA put out a survey about Battlefield 4 they asked for opinions on this idea
    The third DLC description was the most interesting: DINOSAURS! From what I recall, it was described as a coop mode where you and other players would fight against dinosaurs with primitive weapons, specifically mentioning a bow and arrow. Possible names were: BF4: BC, BF4: Primal Combat (or maybe it was Primal Warfare?), BF4: 21942 BC and some other one that was something like BF4: Dino... something. Can't recall.
  • JacobkoshJacobkosh Gamble a stamp! I can show you how to be a real man!Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    Arch wrote: »
    Off the top of my head- Deadpool in Origins. He started off fine, but then what?

    Deadpool is a fantastic example, yeah.

    Mandarin is a pretty good one too. I haven't seen IM3 yet but I hear pretty good things. However, fundamentally, what would have been wrong with having that be an original character? Like, what would that not accomplish that calling him "the Mandarin" despite him not being a Chinese guy with laser rings does?

    I am talking about this with Ell on steam right now so I will c and p my thoughts on how this happens:

    jacobkosh: the mandarin in iron man 3 is a decent example
    jacobkosh: like
    jacobkosh: you can sort of follow the iterative process
    jacobkosh: that led from a chinese dude with laser rings
    Elldren: wait
    Elldren: he isn't chinese?
    jacobkosh: not in the movie
    jacobkosh: he is middle eastern terrorist ringleader
    Elldren: he doesn't have rings of power?
    jacobkosh: no rings
    Elldren: :O
    Elldren: how
    Elldren: is that
    Elldren: the Mandarin?
    jacobkosh: that is what I'm saying
    jacobkosh: it's an iterative process
    jacobkosh: all it takes
    jacobkosh: is one guy saying
    jacobkosh: "well
    Elldren: like he just has those TWO ATTRIBUTES
    jacobkosh: "we can't have a chinese villain
    jacobkosh: "we need to sell this movie in china"
    jacobkosh: and someone else goes "well he can't have those rings, aliens are dumb even though they were in the avengers movie last year that made a billion dollars"
    jacobkosh: and a third person goes "hey ben kingsley is available for eight weeks in the summer"
    jacobkosh: and there you go
    jacobkosh: "the mandarin"
    jacobkosh: you could not ask for a more effective set of filters to screen out any stray bit of creativity than to stick an idea through the big budget movie sausage machine
    jacobkosh: because at each stage everyone just thinks they're "tweaking"
    jacobkosh: it never even OCCURS to them
    jacobkosh: to just
    jacobkosh: do something new
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
    So EA put out a survey about Battlefield 4 they asked for opinions on this idea
    The third DLC description was the most interesting: DINOSAURS! From what I recall, it was described as a coop mode where you and other players would fight against dinosaurs with primitive weapons, specifically mentioning a bow and arrow. Possible names were: BF4: BC, BF4: Primal Combat (or maybe it was Primal Warfare?), BF4: 21942 BC and some other one that was something like BF4: Dino... something. Can't recall.

    I thought this was called Turok
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    Speaking of comic movies

    Rhino....wat?

    andrew-garfield-paul-giamatti-spider-man-rhino-photos-02.jpg
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
    Man Jake, go see IM3

    go go go go gooo
    Currently, I disagree with you and Elldren. But also I hate the Mandarin about as much as I hate fing fang foom, so there it is.
  • ronyaronya hmmm over there!Registered User regular
    recent Iron Man seems to have become more of a foil for tech-driven scifi set in the Marvel universe, than anything else
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    On the subject of character portrayal

    IM3 spoilers
    They should of just used Ezekiel Stane since it was pretty much the same idea anyways
  • japanjapan Registered User regular
    Arch wrote: »
    japan wrote: »
    Arch wrote: »
    japan wrote: »
    Hah, we were just talking about this.

    Part of it comes from the fixation Hollywood has with not changing anything without "rebooting" and re-telling the origin story.

    It is a difficult place to be- the desire to tell an interesting story with a set of characters balanced with the need to explain who they are

    The thing is it so often isn't necessary. Like, Spiderman has been rebooted with a new origin story film about three times in the last few years.

    Everybody knows who Spiderman is. They should just do the Bond thing of telling a Spiderman story without acknowledging changes in actor or whatever.

    I hope we get to that level of cultural Zeitgeist with superheros soon

    Marvel don't really have much option at this point. Once something becomes intertwined with the Avengers it's pretty impractical to reboot it.

    I'm hoping this means that the film industry will get over their continuity fixation, and that nerds will relax a bit about how closely film versions of characters match their preferred comic version. It shouldn't be necessary for a film version to be considered definitive with respect to a given character.
  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    So EA put out a survey about Battlefield 4 they asked for opinions on this idea
    The third DLC description was the most interesting: DINOSAURS! From what I recall, it was described as a coop mode where you and other players would fight against dinosaurs with primitive weapons, specifically mentioning a bow and arrow. Possible names were: BF4: BC, BF4: Primal Combat (or maybe it was Primal Warfare?), BF4: 21942 BC and some other one that was something like BF4: Dino... something. Can't recall.

    #YearOfTheBow
  • ArchArch Trust me, I'm a scientist Registered User regular
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    @RMS Oceanic did you play Soul Sacrifice?
  • evilbobevilbob Registered User regular
    How necessary is seeing Avengers before IM3? Want to see it in cinema but haven't got around to making the time to see Avengers yet.
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    evilbob wrote: »
    How necessary is seeing Avengers before IM3? Want to see it in cinema but haven't got around to making the time to see Avengers yet.

    You can get by just fine without seeing Avengers
  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons LondresRegistered User regular
    I am mildly disappointed that Imran Khan did not win the election, if just because of this photo

    imran-khan_2012953b.jpg
    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons LondresRegistered User regular
    edited May 2013
    Golly. I think I may go through a vegetarian cooking phase again!

    http://www.theveganchickpea.com/2011/12/artichoke-cilantro-soup.html

    IMG_9708.JPG

    Artichoke & Cilantro Soup
    serves 2-4 depending on portion size

    1 tsp olive oil
    1 large shallot, chopped
    2 cloves of garlic, minced
    sea salt
    1 14 oz can fire roasted diced tomatoes
    1 14 oz can of artichoke hearts, packed in water, drained and halved
    3 cups vegetable broth
    4 cups of fresh cilantro, chopped

    In a medium soup pot over medium heat, saute shallots and garlic in olive oil until fragrant and lightly browned, salting as desired. Add in the tomatoes, vegetable broth, and artichokes, stir, and bring to boil. Reduce to low and add in cilantro. Allow soup to simmer for about 5 minutes. Remove from heat and serve!
    Kalkino on
    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    good morning!
    xlh6c3.png
  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons LondresRegistered User regular
    I am also mildly amused that Auckland was named after the man who organised the first catastrophic British invasion of Afghanistan. Although to be fair to the good citizens of that town, it wasn't given the name because of the defeat
    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
This discussion has been closed.