Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.

Ho! Ha ha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust! [Chat]!

12324262829100

Posts

  • PonyPony Registered User regular
    Cinders wrote: »
    Pony wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    I find cherry picking ideas from different religions and remaining spiritual in the sense of believing in something more then myself, whether that be a God or just another layer of existence beyond our own and being in harmony with it, to be preferable to being agnostic (which I look at as lazy) atheist (which is what I would be if I chose to no longer be a deist and is of course filled with it's own pros and cons) or part of an organized religious framework (lots of obvious cons there).

    I grew up Catholic with my grandparents on my mother's side being devout United Church members and after going through that tension between them and the hilariously bad attempts by Catholic run schools to teach me how to live and think about stuff like abortion and gays, I flirted with Buddhism for a while before deciding to just throw up my hands, screw the middle man and commit myself to believing whatever I wanted to believe and felt was the right course for my philosophical and spiritual life.

    I could never see myself staying a Catholic after I gave it a fair shake and read the Catechism and the Bible and even considered giving the priesthood a look after being an altar boy when I was younger. There was just too many questions that my religion teacher in high school would answer with "God will sort it out" and too much BS when it came to moral questions. I am fortunate I guess in that my immediate family was never very religious, but even if they were, I can't see myself accepting it forever.

    ahah!

    atheist versus agnostic now there's something I could talk about.

    But won't.

    anyway if someone asks I'll say atheist even though I'm technically agnostic. Since people think they mean what you seem to think they mean :P

    in a literal sense i am an atheist and i am also religious because religion itself is not bound to theism, they are different words for a reason

    but trying to get folks to move past that is far too difficult, so i generally just

    don't

    Trying to have a conversation about the meaning of agnosticism with my angry atheist friend was fun.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzSMC5rWvos
  • Casual EddyCasual Eddy Registered User regular
    The us prison population statistic is bullshit and is around because other countries lie and because of dumb statistics. Chinas official figure is that they have one of the lowest incarceration rates in the world (bullshit) and north Korea doesn't include their political prisoner camps (they're actually well ahead of us per capita).

    well that sure is fab that we might be doing better than north korea and china with regard to how many of our citizens we imprison

    I'm not trying to argue that the US is a utopia.

    But any time statistics can possibly be at all manipulated and/or faked to make the US seem more awful than it actually is? Yeah, someone will go ahead and do so. There are at least a handful of countries that are worse off than the US but are hidden behind stupid statistics. And most shitty third world dictatorships simply don't have the resources to lock up as many people as they might want so you can't even compare them to the US.

    The US should work to improve the justice system, but let's not spread bullshit.

    we're the goddamn united states

    that we are even being compared to these countries should reveal something to you

    we shouldn't win by a technicality in this category, or be better than a handful of some of the governments with the worst human rights records on the planet
  • OrganichuOrganichu Registered User regular
    Corehealer wrote: »
    Our support of Israel and subsequently it's apartheid system. Call it anti-Semitic all you want, it's a disgraceful situation and I can't believe our government ignores it just because the US does for strategic reasons.

    boo hiss
  • KageraKagera Registered User regular
    Yeah those poor Americans don't even have healthcare.

    Also they have the death penalty still.
    _J_ wrote:
    If we only allowed pedophiles to be parents, then we would never have to worry about children being left alone, unwatched.
    XBL: Fanatical One AIM: itskagera
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    holy fuck someone took their own life live on twitch tonight jesus christ
  • SmasherSmasher Starting to get dizzy Registered User regular
    I've refined my determinism/randomness shtick to something that could fit very neatly onto one side of an index card.

    Like, it seems simple enough to me.

    And I don't have a lot of different places for people to shake my confidence.

    Like, it's all right-there.

    It's not some sprawling argument that relies on layered assumptions.

    The assumptions are simple, and easy enough to recite.

    I've made the example observations punchy enough to keep it interesting to laypeople who don't generally enjoy philosophy.

    It's easy to keep in my head, easy to bring up, easy to use, and easy to defend, and enjoyable at least for me to talk about it, in large part because of those aforementioned factors.
    @Loren Michael I'm curious to hear your thoughts if you feel like typing it up. Looks like you're off for the night so I guess just PM or @ me or something whenever you see this.

  • SarksusSarksus TEN FUCKING DOLLARS Registered User regular
    holy fuck someone took their own life live on twitch tonight jesus christ

    I am adding this to the pile.
  • WinkyWinky Registered User regular
    Sarksus wrote: »
    My outlook is directly a result of hearing about good stuff and bad stuff. I have heard more bad stuff. If the amount of bad stuff is over represented, which is possible, then I need to balance what passes through my filter. But I don't know how to find more good stuff.

    How do I find enough good stuff so that Africa, China and the middle east no longer compose a significant percentage of the world's state.

    It is 100%, absolutely the case that bad stuff is over-represented.

    Srsly brah watch the video on this site

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/nov/19/better-angels-nature-steven-pinker-review
    vspgsp.jpg
  • Evil MultifariousEvil Multifarious Registered User regular
    holy fuck someone took their own life live on twitch tonight jesus christ

    What the FUCK?
  • bloodyroarxxbloodyroarxx Registered User regular
    holy fuck someone took their own life live on twitch tonight jesus christ

    What the FUCK?

    http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=556930
  • CorehealerCorehealer The Apothecary Your Dark Descent FriendRegistered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    I find cherry picking ideas from different religions and remaining spiritual in the sense of believing in something more then myself, whether that be a God or just another layer of existence beyond our own and being in harmony with it, to be preferable to being agnostic (which I look at as lazy) atheist (which is what I would be if I chose to no longer be a deist and is of course filled with it's own pros and cons) or part of an organized religious framework (lots of obvious cons there).

    I grew up Catholic with my grandparents on my mother's side being devout United Church members and after going through that tension between them and the hilariously bad attempts by Catholic run schools to teach me how to live and think about stuff like abortion and gays, I flirted with Buddhism for a while before deciding to just throw up my hands, screw the middle man and commit myself to believing whatever I wanted to believe and felt was the right course for my philosophical and spiritual life.

    I could never see myself staying a Catholic after I gave it a fair shake and read the Catechism and the Bible and even considered giving the priesthood a look after being an altar boy when I was younger. There was just too many questions that my religion teacher in high school would answer with "God will sort it out" and too much BS when it came to moral questions. I am fortunate I guess in that my immediate family was never very religious, but even if they were, I can't see myself accepting it forever.

    ahah!

    atheist versus agnostic now there's something I could talk about.

    But won't.

    anyway if someone asks I'll say atheist even though I'm technically agnostic. Since people think they mean what you seem to think they mean :P

    I prefer to assume agnostic from the onset is lazy, because I know people who use it as a way to avoid the whole religion versus atheism debate altogether and avoid conflict. I tend gauge how much a person has actually thought about said position and then decide later if I found it acceptably thought out.

    Agnostic on it's own is still a valid stance; you can never truly prove whether there is a God, personal or something else, or there isn't one, and that kind of thing can lead people to the conclusion that they admit ignorance (as any good Socratic thinker should) and will simply let death tell them if there is one or not later.
    2ItqRJ7.jpgSteam/Origin/PSN: Corehealer / Core's Streamtastical Livestream (Streaming Wildstar Beta later this year).
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now
    xlh6c3.png
  • CindersCinders Registered User regular
    Oh, Degrasse Tyson-San.
  • Solomaxwell6Solomaxwell6 Registered User regular
    The us prison population statistic is bullshit and is around because other countries lie and because of dumb statistics. Chinas official figure is that they have one of the lowest incarceration rates in the world (bullshit) and north Korea doesn't include their political prisoner camps (they're actually well ahead of us per capita).

    well that sure is fab that we might be doing better than north korea and china with regard to how many of our citizens we imprison

    I'm not trying to argue that the US is a utopia.

    But any time statistics can possibly be at all manipulated and/or faked to make the US seem more awful than it actually is? Yeah, someone will go ahead and do so. There are at least a handful of countries that are worse off than the US but are hidden behind stupid statistics. And most shitty third world dictatorships simply don't have the resources to lock up as many people as they might want so you can't even compare them to the US.

    The US should work to improve the justice system, but let's not spread bullshit.

    we're the goddamn united states

    that we are even being compared to these countries should reveal something to you

    we shouldn't win by a technicality in this category, or be better than a handful of some of the governments with the worst human rights records on the planet

    I don't think "the whole statistic hinges on using made up numbers" is a technicality.

    But that's not the point. When you want to criticize the US, do so. But use actual figures, actual numbers. Use facts. Use logic. Claiming that the US has the highest incarceration rate in the world is smug "America is awful because America" bullshit. We can look at the US incarceration rate and see that it is in fact very high and ask ourselves why it's so high and what we can do to lower it. But throwing in "the US has a higher proportion of its population in prison than North Korea!" just taints the argument.
  • KageraKagera Registered User regular
    Sarksus wrote: »
    holy fuck someone took their own life live on twitch tonight jesus christ

    I am adding this to the pile.

    To be honest your filter seems far more attuned to accepting negativity than positivity. That's okay most people's are the same. That's why the news trafficks in depressing stories instead of 'oh hey look at how amazing this all is and holy shit we just discovered a new test for leoprosy that only costs a buck holy shit so many people won't have to suffer as now fucking awesome whoo!
    _J_ wrote:
    If we only allowed pedophiles to be parents, then we would never have to worry about children being left alone, unwatched.
    XBL: Fanatical One AIM: itskagera
  • OrganichuOrganichu Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now

    huh?
  • AresProphetAresProphet giggle and the flames grow higher Registered User regular
    i still have healthcare because of obamacare

    thanks obama

    i wonder how much all the specialists i've been to would have cost

    guess i'll find out next year when im on regular people insurance

    Regular insurance can be pretty good. The two main problems with it are (1) the barriers to entry and (2) the arbitrariness of many plans.

    ACA reduces both of those problems substantially in exchange for a (likely) cost increase. Which is a big win overall.

    It's not a horror story if my premium goes up 7% in a year or my deductible goes up $250. Inconvenient, but I'll live to bitch about it.

    It's a horror story if I lose coverage because I got sick, or can't qualify for ever coverage again because I had a lapse in it because I lost my job, or am denied treatment for something life-threatening because of obscure fine print. In my case I would not, in fact, have lived to bitch about it.

    Healthcare reform round 2 is gonna be about reducing the cost of medical care overall, and the skids for that are well greased come 2014 when the ACA is mostly in effect. Everyone, even those who see no direct benefit from Obamacare, has a stake in getting this part done.
    no more need for the old empire
    when the indigo children come
  • CorehealerCorehealer The Apothecary Your Dark Descent FriendRegistered User regular
    Also, I love my country all the same and even after being to the States a ton and dating someone from Massachusetts, I still find I am more at home here in Canada and appreciate both our differences and similarities all the more. I am reasonably patriotic, even if we are to a degree America lite.

    There is a reason I was expected by every American I met and got to know to be polite, because Canadians are really nice and polite eh?
    2ItqRJ7.jpgSteam/Origin/PSN: Corehealer / Core's Streamtastical Livestream (Streaming Wildstar Beta later this year).
  • MadCaddyMadCaddy Riksadvokate Registered User regular
    The us prison population statistic is bullshit and is around because other countries lie and because of dumb statistics. Chinas official figure is that they have one of the lowest incarceration rates in the world (bullshit) and north Korea doesn't include their political prisoner camps (they're actually well ahead of us per capita).

    well that sure is fab that we might be doing better than north korea and china with regard to how many of our citizens we imprison

    I'm not trying to argue that the US is a utopia.

    But any time statistics can possibly be at all manipulated and/or faked to make the US seem more awful than it actually is? Yeah, someone will go ahead and do so. There are at least a handful of countries that are worse off than the US but are hidden behind stupid statistics. And most shitty third world dictatorships simply don't have the resources to lock up as many people as they might want so you can't even compare them to the US.

    The US should work to improve the justice system, but let's not spread bullshit.

    There are countries that've advanced and civilized far more than the US. The US' biggest issue was not capitalizing on the wars we waged as much as we could have/historically had. Granted, it's gotten us an outsize say in global policy, but a lot of that was with our industry and infrastructure lead that we squandered. Our universities aren't even cutting edge and accredited to as high a degree (especially State ran) as many Countries that spend a fraction that we do.

    I agree, there are some tweaks necessary for the US to really revitalize and be the high end global leader it can be, but a lot of that has to be battled for hand in hand with entitlement/tax/copyright reform. I'm actually in favor of the World Bank taking the place of the fed, and the IMF and Trade Courts having more teeth/power.
    League of Legends: SorryNotRly Steam: MMForYourHealth Hero Academy: MadCaddy
  • Casual EddyCasual Eddy Registered User regular

    spool32 wrote: »
    Organichu wrote: »
    in a country as big and regionally autonomous as america i think most people express their pride in a very balkanized way. lots of people really a big fan of their coast or their state or their nearest metropolis, or what have you. as a liberal northeastern elitist who lives new york and boston, the south is hardly even an element of my idea of 'i like america'. i don't really buy 'a chain is only as strong as its weakest link' in this context. except in abstract, academic discussions, it's not all that interesting to me. what life is like for a family in a football town in west texas is almost irrelevant to what it's like for a low income youth in south central los angeles or a professional bachelor in washington dc.

    i like that america is big and varied and there's a lot of stuff for almost every appetite- that i could stay in my country and see every biome, every climate, every sensibility, etc. i like the diversity, the breadth of our artistic and scientific achievements (regardless of whether they 'belong' to humanity at large some of them are necessarily implanted in a local way, like american bands touring here or high tech city centers or whatever).

    i don't like that we have so many evangelist bigots or anti-intellectual weirdos, of course, but again that's not something that ever touches me because i live a long way from any of those hotbeds. i don't like how hard it is to travel- how expensive and tedious a process it is to visit other countries, versus living in france. not a fan of the inferior social safety nets, stuff like worker rights and support for the low income.

    the aggregate stuff (national ranking in this or that) is really hard to express or explore in an interesting way.

    If you could tour though the south and turn off the preconceptions, I think you would be amazed and gratified by what you find. You would like it down here, especially as a vacationer.


    I was frequently surprised by how much the idea of Europeans visiting other countries is similar in, distance and finances, to me visiting Dallas or New Orleans or Memphis. Also surprised by just how vastly different the people are in that small range of distance.

    there are some great cities and places and traditions in the south, but the state governments seem to be making a concerted effort to make them awful

    my home state in particular has been kicking around some pretty horrifying legislation
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Sarksus wrote: »
    My outlook is directly a result of hearing about good stuff and bad stuff. I have heard more bad stuff. If the amount of bad stuff is over represented, which is possible, then I need to balance what passes through my filter. But I don't know how to find more good stuff.

    How do I find enough good stuff so that Africa, China and the middle east no longer compose a significant percentage of the world's state.

    what, do you think the common man in china goes around and suffers all day long?

    also, this is just a problem of understanding of the statistics of this.

    Mostly hearing about bad things means that mostly bad things get reported and retold.

    Which could be for two reasons: either, because mostly only the bad things are interesting enough and no-one reports "Man had beer in sun with friends; "It was a good day" he is quoted as saying", or it's because mostly bad things happen.
    xlh6c3.png
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Organichu wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now

    huh?

    how serious are you both about support for israel
    xlh6c3.png
  • Ravenhpltc24Ravenhpltc24 Registered User regular
    Man, Senior Week is already exhausting. I do more things for more hours every day than I've done the last four years at school. Tomorrow I have to get up at 9, go to the gym/shower, go to the Cayuga Creamery for ice cream, go the the Ithaca Brewery and get drunk, come back, eat dinner, get ready to go to a concert, and go to a concert all night. That is like four days worth of activities. Can't do it.
    (V) ( ;,,; ) (V)
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Man, Senior Week is already exhausting. I do more things for more hours every day than I've done the last four years at school. Tomorrow I have to get up at 9, go to the gym/shower, go to the Cayuga Creamery for ice cream, go the the Ithaca Brewery and get drunk, come back, eat dinner, get ready to go to a concert, and go to a concert all night. That is like four days worth of activities. Can't do it.

    yeah that must be so fucking hard.

    Super glad I've only got cramming for exams on my plate.
    xlh6c3.png
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    oh and that was SARCASM

    I hate you right now.
    xlh6c3.png
  • spool32spool32 Contrary Library Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Organichu wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now

    huh?

    how serious are you both about support for israel

    Guess I'd say about 7 out of 10 on the Seriousometer.
    Successful Kickstarter get! Drop by Bare Mettle Entertainment if you'd like to see what we're making.
  • OrganichuOrganichu Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Organichu wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now

    huh?

    how serious are you both about support for israel

    i think talking about my position on the israeli-palestinian conflict is meaningless in these terms

    it is not really reducible in that way to me how it seems to be to the international community
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    spool32 wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Organichu wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now

    huh?

    how serious are you both about support for israel

    Guess I'd say about 7 out of 10 on the Seriousometer.

    hmmm...
    xlh6c3.png
  • WinkyWinky Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now

    This should be a thing.

    Like in a heated discussion where you're not sure who's being serious or not you should be like

    IRONY CHECK

    And then everyone has to report their current irony levels like so:

    [********---]
    7/10 Ironies
    vspgsp.jpg
  • HamurabiHamurabi Registered User regular
    Pony wrote: »
    Cinders wrote: »
    Pony wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    I find cherry picking ideas from different religions and remaining spiritual in the sense of believing in something more then myself, whether that be a God or just another layer of existence beyond our own and being in harmony with it, to be preferable to being agnostic (which I look at as lazy) atheist (which is what I would be if I chose to no longer be a deist and is of course filled with it's own pros and cons) or part of an organized religious framework (lots of obvious cons there).

    I grew up Catholic with my grandparents on my mother's side being devout United Church members and after going through that tension between them and the hilariously bad attempts by Catholic run schools to teach me how to live and think about stuff like abortion and gays, I flirted with Buddhism for a while before deciding to just throw up my hands, screw the middle man and commit myself to believing whatever I wanted to believe and felt was the right course for my philosophical and spiritual life.

    I could never see myself staying a Catholic after I gave it a fair shake and read the Catechism and the Bible and even considered giving the priesthood a look after being an altar boy when I was younger. There was just too many questions that my religion teacher in high school would answer with "God will sort it out" and too much BS when it came to moral questions. I am fortunate I guess in that my immediate family was never very religious, but even if they were, I can't see myself accepting it forever.

    ahah!

    atheist versus agnostic now there's something I could talk about.

    But won't.

    anyway if someone asks I'll say atheist even though I'm technically agnostic. Since people think they mean what you seem to think they mean :P

    in a literal sense i am an atheist and i am also religious because religion itself is not bound to theism, they are different words for a reason

    but trying to get folks to move past that is far too difficult, so i generally just

    don't

    Trying to have a conversation about the meaning of agnosticism with my angry atheist friend was fun.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzSMC5rWvos

    I don't disagree with any of this... except the golf analogy is dumb.
    network_sig2.png
  • Casual EddyCasual Eddy Registered User regular
    The us prison population statistic is bullshit and is around because other countries lie and because of dumb statistics. Chinas official figure is that they have one of the lowest incarceration rates in the world (bullshit) and north Korea doesn't include their political prisoner camps (they're actually well ahead of us per capita).

    well that sure is fab that we might be doing better than north korea and china with regard to how many of our citizens we imprison

    I'm not trying to argue that the US is a utopia.

    But any time statistics can possibly be at all manipulated and/or faked to make the US seem more awful than it actually is? Yeah, someone will go ahead and do so. There are at least a handful of countries that are worse off than the US but are hidden behind stupid statistics. And most shitty third world dictatorships simply don't have the resources to lock up as many people as they might want so you can't even compare them to the US.

    The US should work to improve the justice system, but let's not spread bullshit.

    we're the goddamn united states

    that we are even being compared to these countries should reveal something to you

    we shouldn't win by a technicality in this category, or be better than a handful of some of the governments with the worst human rights records on the planet

    I don't think "the whole statistic hinges on using made up numbers" is a technicality.

    But that's not the point. When you want to criticize the US, do so. But use actual figures, actual numbers. Use facts. Use logic. Claiming that the US has the highest incarceration rate in the world is smug "America is awful because America" bullshit. We can look at the US incarceration rate and see that it is in fact very high and ask ourselves why it's so high and what we can do to lower it. But throwing in "the US has a higher proportion of its population in prison than North Korea!" just taints the argument.

    fine. america has lower incarceration rates than dictatorships and oligarchies that brutally repress dissidents

    but not many of them, because we're (almost!) the worst

    land of the freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    EagleCrying.jpg
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Organichu wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Organichu wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    chu, spool

    you both need to state your irony levels, now

    huh?

    how serious are you both about support for israel

    i think talking about my position on the israeli-palestinian conflict is meaningless in these terms

    it is not really reducible in that way to me how it seems to be to the international community

    supporting israel isn't just supporting their side in that conflict
    xlh6c3.png
  • PonyPony Registered User regular
    Corehealer wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    I find cherry picking ideas from different religions and remaining spiritual in the sense of believing in something more then myself, whether that be a God or just another layer of existence beyond our own and being in harmony with it, to be preferable to being agnostic (which I look at as lazy) atheist (which is what I would be if I chose to no longer be a deist and is of course filled with it's own pros and cons) or part of an organized religious framework (lots of obvious cons there).

    I grew up Catholic with my grandparents on my mother's side being devout United Church members and after going through that tension between them and the hilariously bad attempts by Catholic run schools to teach me how to live and think about stuff like abortion and gays, I flirted with Buddhism for a while before deciding to just throw up my hands, screw the middle man and commit myself to believing whatever I wanted to believe and felt was the right course for my philosophical and spiritual life.

    I could never see myself staying a Catholic after I gave it a fair shake and read the Catechism and the Bible and even considered giving the priesthood a look after being an altar boy when I was younger. There was just too many questions that my religion teacher in high school would answer with "God will sort it out" and too much BS when it came to moral questions. I am fortunate I guess in that my immediate family was never very religious, but even if they were, I can't see myself accepting it forever.

    ahah!

    atheist versus agnostic now there's something I could talk about.

    But won't.

    anyway if someone asks I'll say atheist even though I'm technically agnostic. Since people think they mean what you seem to think they mean :P

    I prefer to assume agnostic from the onset is lazy, because I know people who use it as a way to avoid the whole religion versus atheism debate altogether and avoid conflict. I tend gauge how much a person has actually thought about said position and then decide later if I found it acceptably thought out.

    Agnostic on it's own is still a valid stance; you can never truly prove whether there is a God, personal or something else, or there isn't one, and that kind of thing can lead people to the conclusion that they admit ignorance (as any good Socratic thinker should) and will simply let death tell them if there is one or not later.

    for me this ties to what I was saying to Loren; i don't abide beliefs I consider meritless for me or without value in my life.

    "proof" one way or the other on this issue, isn't important to me, as is so readily and astutely observed such proof is objectively lacking in either direction. there's only intuition and deductive reasoning, oft terrible bedfellows really

    but does it matter? well, for me it does. my universe, my view of my life, my perspective on the world, is bettered for me by way of believing there is no god or gods. so, that is what i opt to believe. in lieu of conclusive evidence one way or the other, i go with the belief that meaningfully harms none and meaningfully aids me.

    when others do the same, and yet come to a different belief or conclusion, but based on the same criteria?

    i don't really fault them that, and i gain nothing from trying to "prove" to them I'm right, because the truth is, objectively

    there's no way for my living mind to know

    so i take it as an article of faith instead, and being thus don't care the begrudge people their own articles of faith that view differently, so long as the consequences of their beliefs don't run afoul of what i consider important in life
  • Solomaxwell6Solomaxwell6 Registered User regular
    Israel would be a pretty cool place if it was everything that politicians and my Jewish friends say it is.
  • Ravenhpltc24Ravenhpltc24 Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh and that was SARCASM

    I hate you right now.

    REVENGE, SWEET REVENGE!!! :twisted:
    (V) ( ;,,; ) (V)
  • Ravenhpltc24Ravenhpltc24 Registered User regular
    Also if this hasn't been posted already, this is VERY IMPORTANT:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=C5ddjzGft0k
    (V) ( ;,,; ) (V)
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Pony wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    I find cherry picking ideas from different religions and remaining spiritual in the sense of believing in something more then myself, whether that be a God or just another layer of existence beyond our own and being in harmony with it, to be preferable to being agnostic (which I look at as lazy) atheist (which is what I would be if I chose to no longer be a deist and is of course filled with it's own pros and cons) or part of an organized religious framework (lots of obvious cons there).

    I grew up Catholic with my grandparents on my mother's side being devout United Church members and after going through that tension between them and the hilariously bad attempts by Catholic run schools to teach me how to live and think about stuff like abortion and gays, I flirted with Buddhism for a while before deciding to just throw up my hands, screw the middle man and commit myself to believing whatever I wanted to believe and felt was the right course for my philosophical and spiritual life.

    I could never see myself staying a Catholic after I gave it a fair shake and read the Catechism and the Bible and even considered giving the priesthood a look after being an altar boy when I was younger. There was just too many questions that my religion teacher in high school would answer with "God will sort it out" and too much BS when it came to moral questions. I am fortunate I guess in that my immediate family was never very religious, but even if they were, I can't see myself accepting it forever.

    ahah!

    atheist versus agnostic now there's something I could talk about.

    But won't.

    anyway if someone asks I'll say atheist even though I'm technically agnostic. Since people think they mean what you seem to think they mean :P

    I prefer to assume agnostic from the onset is lazy, because I know people who use it as a way to avoid the whole religion versus atheism debate altogether and avoid conflict. I tend gauge how much a person has actually thought about said position and then decide later if I found it acceptably thought out.

    Agnostic on it's own is still a valid stance; you can never truly prove whether there is a God, personal or something else, or there isn't one, and that kind of thing can lead people to the conclusion that they admit ignorance (as any good Socratic thinker should) and will simply let death tell them if there is one or not later.

    for me this ties to what I was saying to Loren; i don't abide beliefs I consider meritless for me or without value in my life.

    "proof" one way or the other on this issue, isn't important to me, as is so readily and astutely observed such proof is objectively lacking in either direction. there's only intuition and deductive reasoning, oft terrible bedfellows really

    but does it matter? well, for me it does. my universe, my view of my life, my perspective on the world, is bettered for me by way of believing there is no god or gods. so, that is what i opt to believe. in lieu of conclusive evidence one way or the other, i go with the belief that meaningfully harms none and meaningfully aids me.

    when others do the same, and yet come to a different belief or conclusion, but based on the same criteria?

    i don't really fault them that, and i gain nothing from trying to "prove" to them I'm right, because the truth is, objectively

    there's no way for my living mind to know

    so i take it as an article of faith instead, and being thus don't care the begrudge people their own articles of faith that view differently, so long as the consequences of their beliefs don't run afoul of what i consider important in life

    based from the same criteria, ok, but what about not based on the same criteria at all?
    xlh6c3.png
  • SarksusSarksus TEN FUCKING DOLLARS Registered User regular
    Winky wrote: »
    Sarksus wrote: »
    My outlook is directly a result of hearing about good stuff and bad stuff. I have heard more bad stuff. If the amount of bad stuff is over represented, which is possible, then I need to balance what passes through my filter. But I don't know how to find more good stuff.

    How do I find enough good stuff so that Africa, China and the middle east no longer compose a significant percentage of the world's state.

    It is 100%, absolutely the case that bad stuff is over-represented.

    Srsly brah watch the video on this site

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/nov/19/better-angels-nature-steven-pinker-review

    Yes I am aware of what the balance probably is, but I still need more. I need some way of comparing the good and the bad so that the bad is less significant.
  • AbdhyiusAbdhyius Registered User regular
    Abdhyius wrote: »
    oh and that was SARCASM

    I hate you right now.

    REVENGE, SWEET REVENGE!!! :twisted:

    revenge for what!
    xlh6c3.png
  • CindersCinders Registered User regular
    Wait, it's all streaming at once?
This discussion has been closed.