Our rules have been updated and given
their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it,
follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
[chat] going one way, people another
Posts
she got prescribed antibiotics and an inhaler and cough syrup
with codine
PURPLE DRANK
i love you too chu
i just can't quit you
A lotta technocrats jump ship between administrations. It's the norm not the exception.
but i was so bad the last few times i played
so bad
nerd was born in 1995
that still freaks me out
i'm The 21st Century, Dogg.
I was born on january 1st 2001
Like CCGs? Check my CCG's Thread in CF and help me playtest it!
WOOHOO
(now I wonder whether it will converge after I change it from a puny two to all six lags...?)
I did not make the claim he is asking me to explain.
Remember Li'l Wayne skippy, a cautionary tale!
i need red on soraka for bananas fyi hth
Oathkeeper - Updates Monday/Wednesday/Friday
Buy Issue One! >< Two! >< Three!
NEW! >< Four!
I WINDWILL
> cat('\nLog-likelihood function= ', lf) Log-likelihood function= 4.956079 > cat('\nCoefficients') Coefficients > print(bhat) [1] 0.031683574 -0.454204743 -0.084708628 -0.839169050 0.664150399 -0.020883819 0.566460358 -0.212886222 0.854935768 -0.447691409 [11] 0.037874970 0.013646909 -0.042167797 0.136308098 0.424716387 -0.054590371 0.001199492 0.579607977 0.220807365 -0.171497354 [21] -0.073240482 -0.148727252 -0.384038570 -0.122752821 > cat('\nStandard Errors') Standard Errors > print(sqrt(diag(omega))) [1] 0.091554647 2.107452371 0.646285060 3.410657999 1.714507346 0.098059681 2.202028107 0.674715496 3.653631031 1.839207739 0.119598160 [12] 0.003830765 0.083305123 0.081426288 0.104379239 0.105474229 0.007883078 0.182755835 0.178874032 0.173677238 0.171912331 0.137008218 [23] 1.289242416 0.088344738SUCK IT
Because of how the longstanding (read: pre-Obama) practices for selecting a filer or applicant for additional scrutiny (establishing criteria that automatically triggers scrutiny rather than allowing an individual to cherry-pick applicants out of the pool), and because the influx of new 501(c)(4) applications reflected predominantly conservative groups, any criteria established to make sure that those new 501(c)(4) applications coming in post-Citizens United was going to be inherently political in nature.
That the criteria eventually selected is especially stupid is not in dispute; I agree with you that it's dumb.
At the same time, I'm not sure what I would look for in an application that would lead me to scrutinize it. A 501(c)(4) is allowed to engage in political activism provided that political activism is not the primary purpose of the organization, so I would take it for granted that the word "election" doesn't appear in very many 501(c)(4) applications, if it indeed appears in any at all. It's the sort of obvious thing that any applicant would actively dance around to ensure that their application wasn't denied.
So I'm kind of at an awkward place where I'm upset that this criteria was used, but I also don't know that there's a better criteria for additional scrutiny that one could reliably utilize, and as someone who thinks that the electoral process underpins our entire way of conducting a society, I would certainly not be comfortable with absolutely no additional scrutiny. It's just a shitty thing all around as a consequence.
IRS Ends 2-Year Probe Of NAACP's Tax Status
IRS ends church probe but stirs new questions
I'm sure you were just as outraged then right? When it was more than just getting asked for extra paperwork, there was evidence of coordination and President Bush stonewalled? But Obama admitting he's pissed about it and where the auditing was much less blatantly wrong, there's no indication as of yet of political or interdepartmental (or even Washington) involvement, and Obama/Justice are being transparent its an indictment of all that is not GOP.
Hell the head of the IRS was a Bush appointee when this happened.
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
oh man I know
what I meant was, take 100 hours or so, practice up, and then come back to lol you nub
no man it's cool
that's just the heat sink
I don't care that it annoys you and you don't like it.
It annoys me. I don't like.
But the ridiculous things you said were still ridiculous. Because you are ignoring what actually happened to craft some narrative where the Evil Obummer Admin is doing Evil Things.
It's silly, that this IRS thing is your barometer over whether or not the administration is "corrupt" and thinks of you "as an enemy".
The administration actually did the right thing when it comes to the IRS thing. Being mad at them over it is a bit daft.
I bring up the AP thing because it's an actual Thing that is actually Pretty Bad. Compared to the IRS thing, which is even more of an inflated story than Benghazi.
if you guys want to get after each other re: the irs thing
or the bengazi thing
or whatever else
we have a process for this!
make a thread.
Suburbs are the master race, everything else is for poors.
You are saying a lotta stuff that has zero basis in fact, so I get his hyperbole. Just wanted to make sure people knew that mid-level government employees retain position between Executives.
are you on sixth street?
no?
you're in the suburbs
idgaf
Hold me
you horrible elitist
my address is austin and I am near the hippest and most bustling heart
the regression suggests that the granger causality flowing from output to money begins changing around 1979q1-1979q2
and the granger causality from money to output begins changing around 1988q4-1989q1
hmmm.
re:RE:RE:RE:fw:RE:FW:RE:FW INSTRUCTIONS BY WILL
Oathkeeper - Updates Monday/Wednesday/Friday
Buy Issue One! >< Two! >< Three!
NEW! >< Four!
I agree with most of this. It'd be very hard to establish non-biased (one way or the other.) audit guidelines.
because i am such a nice guy i will halp u
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
The problem with that is I've contacted Professors and advisers but have yet to hear back form them. Is that common? I mean if I submit it this year, in October, it isn't to early to be asking questions right?
just a short drive to the wal-mart!
got a dark skinned friend look like michael jackson