Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.

Rabbit Season! Duck Season! [Chat] Season!

12728303233100

Posts

  • ronyaronya hmmm over there!Registered User regular
    edited May 2013
    fffff
    Error in solve.default(A) : 
      Lapack routine dgesv: system is exactly singular
    
    ronya on
  • WinkyWinky Registered User regular
    Winky wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    MadCaddy wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    I think trying to determine whether the Internet is overall a net positive is like asking whether radio or television were a net positive. I would say their positive outweigh their negatives, strictly in terms of utility derived.

    As to whether they make us "better people"... that's a really loaded question.

    Though the topic reminds me very strongly of back when people were asking whether the Arab Spring was "good for America." It just strikes me as such a silly question. It's like asking whether the tides are "good" -- you don't really judge their "goodness" so much as just deal with the consequences.

    I think the internet is more analogous to telegraph, actual written language and telephone as far as comparisons. It's the approachability and innovation through evolution, and the rapid evolution if a great many memes that've allowed a lot of our sociological changes in the US for the better, in recent memory.

    I'd say the average US citizen knows more about China and Africa now, and more about the wars were in, than during the 80s and earl 90s.

    ...you did see that recent poll about where Bengazi is, right?

    I have a better question for you angel: what would that poll have looked like in the 1980s?

    About the same, perhaps a bit worse. You can lead someone to knowledge, but you can't make them think.

    That's the thing angel, I believe people want to think. I think ignorance is what happens when you're starved for avenues of learning, and willful ignorance only happens when you've been explicitly trained in it.

    Counterpoint: Elevatorgate.

    1. I had to look that up and the whole situation is completely retarded on many levels.

    2. Completely avoiding the debate about whether or not Dawkins was being a douche here, which I do not want to touch with a 10 foot pole ever in my life, any other hypothetical situation in which someone who is otherwise highly educated acts in ignorance doesn't refute my point here. Ignorance about sexism is something that we are trained in by society. Being an incredibly intelligent person doesn't make you immune to it. Overcoming that training towards ignorance isn't easy or automatic.
    vspgsp.jpg
  • Captain CarrotCaptain Carrot Registered User regular
    Echo wrote: »
    spool32 wrote: »
    My father-in-law, who is an Archaeologist at Texas A&M, will talk your ear off about how there were geniuses in the clovis era just like there are today. He's quite frustrated by the tendency to assume that ancient peoples were somehow less innovative or resourceful than we are.

    Yeah. People who assume that conveniently forget the long-ass era of very smart people coming up with very smart things every couple of decades, and how they build on the smart things of older smart people. We're benefiting from the result of these centuries of smart people.

    There were probably hundreds of people that would gotten the Nobel prize in mathematics had they lived today, that came up with intelligent things in their shitty mudhole in the 8th century and took their innovation to the grave.

    No one has ever gotten a Nobel Prize in mathematics. smug.gif
  • Caveman PawsCaveman Paws Registered User regular
    The Mongols would launch low grade explosives via catapult type contraptions. And trees.

    It's gotta be true I heard it on a podcast.
  • ShivahnShivahn Registered User regular
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    It's hard coming up with warm ups using the passive voice for my students.

    It's a rather cumbersome sentence construction.

    Fill in the blanks?

    The ___ was ___

    Or just describing you doing something to an object?

    Like pick up a pencil

    "The pencil was picked up"
  • HamurabiHamurabi Registered User regular
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Sarksus wrote: »
    On Seinfeld is the episode where they are at this party out in the stix and George is gonna get laid so he can't drive Elaine and Jerry back to NYC so they call up Kramer

    such a weird episode in the context of modern times, they have to call Kramer on a land line and then, AND THEN, they have to give him directions! And if he forgets the directions he's fucked. And that's basically what happens. He gets lost and it takes him forever to find the place.

    THE NINETIES.

    Oh men.

    Not asking for directions.

    I wonder what other stereotypes are gonna just be flat out "what the fuck?" as technology marches on.

    I do wish there was a convenient way to ping myself on someone else's Google Maps app or Facebook or something. I think Facebook let you do it at one point.

    Would've saved me SO much time trying to guide people around who were trying to pick me up on campus.
    network_sig2.png
  • GooeyGooey Registered User regular
    what are you guys talking about people in olden times were fucking dumb we are so much smarter than them
    919UOwT.png
  • EchoEcho Per Aspera Ad Inferi Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    No one has ever gotten a Nobel Prize in mathematics. smug.gif

    See? Just like I said!
  • EchoEcho Per Aspera Ad Inferi Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    Gooey wrote: »
    what are you guys talking about people in olden times were fucking dumb we are so much smarter than them

    He wrote, dubsteppingly
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    It's hard coming up with warm ups using the passive voice for my students.

    It's a rather cumbersome sentence construction.

    Fill in the blanks?

    The ___ was ___

    Or just describing you doing something to an object?

    Like pick up a pencil

    "The pencil was picked up"

    Oh you sweet summer child. (I kid, I kid)

    The trick is finding something my students can do and would find interesting enough to actually do.
    AoTsig_zps8cfd65c2.png
  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Sarksus wrote: »
    On Seinfeld is the episode where they are at this party out in the stix and George is gonna get laid so he can't drive Elaine and Jerry back to NYC so they call up Kramer

    such a weird episode in the context of modern times, they have to call Kramer on a land line and then, AND THEN, they have to give him directions! And if he forgets the directions he's fucked. And that's basically what happens. He gets lost and it takes him forever to find the place.

    THE NINETIES.

    Oh men.

    Not asking for directions.

    I wonder what other stereotypes are gonna just be flat out "what the fuck?" as technology marches on.

    I do wish there was a convenient way to ping myself on someone else's Google Maps app or Facebook or something. I think Facebook let you do it at one point.

    Would've saved me SO much time trying to guide people around who were trying to pick me up on campus.

    Google Latitude
    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
  • poshnialloposhniallo Registered User regular
    Echo wrote: »
    And that the issue wasn't the concept of copyright in of itself, but that it was bound to censorship.

    Copyright is an infringement on property rights as well as censorship.

    The state is aware of this fact and deems it appropriate.

    Care to explain? Because I'll point out that the UN considers copyright to be a human right.

    He already did, I thought, in his post about the history of copyright.
    Neal Stephenson wrote:
    It was, of course, nothing more than sexism, the especially virulent type espoused by male techies who sincerely believe that they are too smart to be sexists.
  • SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    SammyF wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    You know, I'm not up on tax law or anything... but aren't explicitly political groups unable to gain tax-exempt status?

    Most political action committees don't pay taxes. The special question here is whether politically-focused organizations can organize as 501(c)(4)'s in order to avoid paying taxes and avoid disclosing contributions.

    Aren't the 501C4 and/or "superPAC" regulations stupidly broken so that they can either avoid disclosing, or only disclose after the election, but still spend unlimited amounts of money?

    Nope, Super PACs (termed "Independent Expenditure-only Filers by the FEC) are quarterly filers. You can read all of their quarterlies on the FEC website, including their donors and how much are given. That the Super PAC as a political instrument is somehow not quite yet fucking broken enough is what lead a lot of organizations -- primarily conservative ones -- to request 501(c)(4) status.

    Most of the political boogeymen of 2012 that are frequently referred to as "Super PACs" -- like Crossroads GPS -- were actually 501(c)(4)'s, which is why there's some confusion about the distinction now.
  • Caveman PawsCaveman Paws Registered User regular
    I'm still proud of my ability to read a map and navigate by compass.

    Makes me feel old and old.
  • ShivahnShivahn Registered User regular
    Winky wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    MadCaddy wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    I think trying to determine whether the Internet is overall a net positive is like asking whether radio or television were a net positive. I would say their positive outweigh their negatives, strictly in terms of utility derived.

    As to whether they make us "better people"... that's a really loaded question.

    Though the topic reminds me very strongly of back when people were asking whether the Arab Spring was "good for America." It just strikes me as such a silly question. It's like asking whether the tides are "good" -- you don't really judge their "goodness" so much as just deal with the consequences.

    I think the internet is more analogous to telegraph, actual written language and telephone as far as comparisons. It's the approachability and innovation through evolution, and the rapid evolution if a great many memes that've allowed a lot of our sociological changes in the US for the better, in recent memory.

    I'd say the average US citizen knows more about China and Africa now, and more about the wars were in, than during the 80s and earl 90s.

    ...you did see that recent poll about where Bengazi is, right?

    I have a better question for you angel: what would that poll have looked like in the 1980s?

    About the same, perhaps a bit worse. You can lead someone to knowledge, but you can't make them think.

    That's the thing angel, I believe people want to think. I think ignorance is what happens when you're starved for avenues of learning, and willful ignorance only happens when you've been explicitly trained in it.

    Counterpoint: Elevatorgate.

    1. I had to look that up and the whole situation is completely retarded on many levels.

    2. Completely avoiding the debate about whether or not Dawkins was being a douche here, which I do not want to touch with a 10 foot pole ever in my life, any other hypothetical situation in which someone who is otherwise highly educated acts in ignorance doesn't refute my point here. Ignorance about sexism is something that we are trained in by society. Being an incredibly intelligent person doesn't make you immune to it. Overcoming that training towards ignorance isn't easy or automatic.

    Being incredibly smart can actually entrench such views.
  • SarksusSarksus TEN FUCKING DOLLARS Registered User regular
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    It's hard coming up with warm ups using the passive voice for my students.

    It's a rather cumbersome sentence construction.

    Fill in the blanks?

    The ___ was ___

    Or just describing you doing something to an object?

    Like pick up a pencil

    "The pencil was picked up"

    Oh you sweet summer child. (I kid, I kid)

    The trick is finding something my students can do and would find interesting enough to actually do.


    The anime was renewed by the studio for another season
  • SarksusSarksus TEN FUCKING DOLLARS Registered User regular
    Gooey wrote: »
    what are you guys talking about people in olden times were fucking dumb we are so much smarter than them

    didn't even have ipads
  • HamurabiHamurabi Registered User regular
    Echo wrote: »
    Gooey wrote: »
    what are you guys talking about people in olden times were fucking dumb we are so much smarter than them

    He wrote, dubsteppingly

    In a previous life, gooey was a serf who stubbed dep for a loving.
    network_sig2.png
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    Feral wrote: »
    And that the issue wasn't the concept of copyright in of itself, but that it was bound to censorship.

    heh

    lol

    So, you think it's going to be a good thing when Google can take your pictures from Picasa and use them as they want without recompense?

    I don't have pictures on Picasa. Do you prefer Nikon or Canon cameras? I mean, since we're jumping around asking each other tangentially-related questions. :P

    As Echo pointed out, copyright is censorship; just a legitimate form of it.

    No, copyright isn't censorship, unless you stretch the meaning of censorship out to meaninglessness. A book, song, movie, etc. isn't an idea.
    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum
    Nox+Aeternum.gif
    Damn straight and I'm not giving up any of my crazy ground to some no talent hack.
  • WinkyWinky Registered User regular
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Echo wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    That's the thing angel, I believe people want to think. I think ignorance is what happens when you're starved for avenues of learning, and willful ignorance only happens when you've been explicitly trained in it.

    Warren Ellis wrote a great graphic novel about the battle of Crecy, with an English longbow archer as the narrator, breaking the fourth wall and talking directly to the reader.

    "We have the same intelligence as you. We simply don't have the same cumulative knowledge you do."

    It does grate me when people act like people in the past were just blubbering imbeciles. Obviously they did not know everything we know but given their knowledge base at the time they did great stuff. People acting like folks still thought the world was round when Columbus was sailing about.

    Or like, "Oh yeah, plate armor was totally impractical and you had to be hoisted on to horses and if you fell over you couldn't get up blah blah blah" People aren't going to spend tons of time and money on making something that makes them more likely to die in combat. (Well, more than a couple times at least, I am sure some people have carried some pretty dumb ideas on to the battlefield at at least one point).

    I will say, however, that people in the past appear unbelievably cruel and callous.

    Granted, this is largely because they didn't have a very large circle of empathy. There tended to be a relatively small group of people that they really thought of as people, and when we fail to think of others in the same way today we can reach the same extremes.
    vspgsp.jpg
  • GooeyGooey Registered User regular
    Sarksus wrote: »
    Gooey wrote: »
    what are you guys talking about people in olden times were fucking dumb we are so much smarter than them

    didn't even have ipads

    you could ask a roman what zero was and they would be all confused
    919UOwT.png
  • poshnialloposhniallo Registered User regular
    Oh, and @AngelHedgie, that was a textbook 'appeal to authority' and we don't see enough of those in the wild. Thank you.
    Neal Stephenson wrote:
    It was, of course, nothing more than sexism, the especially virulent type espoused by male techies who sincerely believe that they are too smart to be sexists.
  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    Feral wrote: »
    And that the issue wasn't the concept of copyright in of itself, but that it was bound to censorship.

    heh

    lol

    So, you think it's going to be a good thing when Google can take your pictures from Picasa and use them as they want without recompense?

    I don't have pictures on Picasa. Do you prefer Nikon or Canon cameras? I mean, since we're jumping around asking each other tangentially-related questions. :P

    As Echo pointed out, copyright is censorship; just a legitimate form of it.

    No, copyright isn't censorship, unless you stretch the meaning of censorship out to meaninglessness. A book, song, movie, etc. isn't an idea.

    tumblr_lvv4jvx4xj1qemoij.png
    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    MadCaddy wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    I think trying to determine whether the Internet is overall a net positive is like asking whether radio or television were a net positive. I would say their positive outweigh their negatives, strictly in terms of utility derived.

    As to whether they make us "better people"... that's a really loaded question.

    Though the topic reminds me very strongly of back when people were asking whether the Arab Spring was "good for America." It just strikes me as such a silly question. It's like asking whether the tides are "good" -- you don't really judge their "goodness" so much as just deal with the consequences.

    I think the internet is more analogous to telegraph, actual written language and telephone as far as comparisons. It's the approachability and innovation through evolution, and the rapid evolution if a great many memes that've allowed a lot of our sociological changes in the US for the better, in recent memory.

    I'd say the average US citizen knows more about China and Africa now, and more about the wars were in, than during the 80s and earl 90s.

    ...you did see that recent poll about where Bengazi is, right?

    I have a better question for you angel: what would that poll have looked like in the 1980s?

    About the same, perhaps a bit worse. You can lead someone to knowledge, but you can't make them think.

    That's the thing angel, I believe people want to think. I think ignorance is what happens when you're starved for avenues of learning, and willful ignorance only happens when you've been explicitly trained in it.

    Counterpoint: Elevatorgate.

    1. I had to look that up and the whole situation is completely retarded on many levels.

    2. Completely avoiding the debate about whether or not Dawkins was being a douche here, which I do not want to touch with a 10 foot pole ever in my life, any other hypothetical situation in which someone who is otherwise highly educated acts in ignorance doesn't refute my point here. Ignorance about sexism is something that we are trained in by society. Being an incredibly intelligent person doesn't make you immune to it. Overcoming that training towards ignorance isn't easy or automatic.

    Being incredibly smart can actually entrench such views.

    Which is why con artists see intelligent individuals as good marks.
    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum
    Nox+Aeternum.gif
    Damn straight and I'm not giving up any of my crazy ground to some no talent hack.
  • ShivahnShivahn Registered User regular
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    It's hard coming up with warm ups using the passive voice for my students.

    It's a rather cumbersome sentence construction.

    Fill in the blanks?

    The ___ was ___

    Or just describing you doing something to an object?

    Like pick up a pencil

    "The pencil was picked up"

    Oh you sweet summer child. (I kid, I kid)

    The trick is finding something my students can do and would find interesting enough to actually do.

    I have a confession.

    I am not actually a teacher type person.

    I am going to die when I TA this year.
  • SarksusSarksus TEN FUCKING DOLLARS Registered User regular
    7mkeGCp.png?1
  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    Gooey wrote: »
    Sarksus wrote: »
    Gooey wrote: »
    what are you guys talking about people in olden times were fucking dumb we are so much smarter than them

    didn't even have ipads

    you could ask a roman what zero was and they would be all confused

    they didn't have wobble bass
    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
  • HamurabiHamurabi Registered User regular
    SammyF wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    SammyF wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    You know, I'm not up on tax law or anything... but aren't explicitly political groups unable to gain tax-exempt status?

    Most political action committees don't pay taxes. The special question here is whether politically-focused organizations can organize as 501(c)(4)'s in order to avoid paying taxes and avoid disclosing contributions.

    Aren't the 501C4 and/or "superPAC" regulations stupidly broken so that they can either avoid disclosing, or only disclose after the election, but still spend unlimited amounts of money?

    Nope, Super PACs (termed "Independent Expenditure-only Filers by the FEC) are quarterly filers. You can read all of their quarterlies on the FEC website, including their donors and how much are given. That the Super PAC as a political instrument is somehow not quite yet fucking broken enough is what lead a lot of organizations -- primarily conservative ones -- to request 501(c)(4) status.

    Most of the political boogeymen of 2012 that are frequently referred to as "Super PACs" -- like Crossroads GPS -- were actually 501(c)(4)'s, which is why there's some confusion about the distinction now.

    Ah. Yeah I'm pretty keen on reading the academic retrospectives on the impact of superPACs and 501c4's on the vote post-Citizens United.
    network_sig2.png
  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    historians of the future will classify history by BW and AW

    before wobble and antewobble
    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
  • CindersCinders Registered User regular
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    It's hard coming up with warm ups using the passive voice for my students.

    It's a rather cumbersome sentence construction.

    Fill in the blanks?

    The ___ was ___

    Or just describing you doing something to an object?

    Like pick up a pencil

    "The pencil was picked up"

    Oh you sweet summer child. (I kid, I kid)

    The trick is finding something my students can do and would find interesting enough to actually do.

    I have a confession.

    I am not actually a teacher type person.

    I am going to die when I TA this year.

    Just bring a whip to class.
  • ShivahnShivahn Registered User regular
    Winky wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Echo wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    That's the thing angel, I believe people want to think. I think ignorance is what happens when you're starved for avenues of learning, and willful ignorance only happens when you've been explicitly trained in it.

    Warren Ellis wrote a great graphic novel about the battle of Crecy, with an English longbow archer as the narrator, breaking the fourth wall and talking directly to the reader.

    "We have the same intelligence as you. We simply don't have the same cumulative knowledge you do."

    It does grate me when people act like people in the past were just blubbering imbeciles. Obviously they did not know everything we know but given their knowledge base at the time they did great stuff. People acting like folks still thought the world was round when Columbus was sailing about.

    Or like, "Oh yeah, plate armor was totally impractical and you had to be hoisted on to horses and if you fell over you couldn't get up blah blah blah" People aren't going to spend tons of time and money on making something that makes them more likely to die in combat. (Well, more than a couple times at least, I am sure some people have carried some pretty dumb ideas on to the battlefield at at least one point).

    I will say, however, that people in the past appear unbelievably cruel and callous.

    Granted, this is largely because they didn't have a very large circle of empathy. There tended to be a relatively small group of people that they really thought of as people, and when we fail to think of others in the same way today we can reach the same extremes.

    Well, people are still callous.

    They appear cruel and callous, sure, but... really that's only because the suffering was right in front of them.
  • FeralFeral Who needs a medical license when you've got style? Registered User regular
    Echo wrote: »
    There's a special brand of "but I'm too intelligent to be misogynistic!" misogynism.

    neal stephenson too smart to be sexist snow crash etc etc etc
    I am comforted by Richard Dawkins’ theory of memes. Those are mental units: thoughts, ideas, gestures, notions, songs, beliefs, rhymes, ideals, teachings, sayings, phrases, clichés that move from mind to mind as genes move from body to body. After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes. - Roger Ebert, I Do Not Fear Death
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    Winky wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Echo wrote: »
    Winky wrote: »
    That's the thing angel, I believe people want to think. I think ignorance is what happens when you're starved for avenues of learning, and willful ignorance only happens when you've been explicitly trained in it.

    Warren Ellis wrote a great graphic novel about the battle of Crecy, with an English longbow archer as the narrator, breaking the fourth wall and talking directly to the reader.

    "We have the same intelligence as you. We simply don't have the same cumulative knowledge you do."

    It does grate me when people act like people in the past were just blubbering imbeciles. Obviously they did not know everything we know but given their knowledge base at the time they did great stuff. People acting like folks still thought the world was round when Columbus was sailing about.

    Or like, "Oh yeah, plate armor was totally impractical and you had to be hoisted on to horses and if you fell over you couldn't get up blah blah blah" People aren't going to spend tons of time and money on making something that makes them more likely to die in combat. (Well, more than a couple times at least, I am sure some people have carried some pretty dumb ideas on to the battlefield at at least one point).

    I will say, however, that people in the past appear unbelievably cruel and callous.

    Granted, this is largely because they didn't have a very large circle of empathy. There tended to be a relatively small group of people that they really thought of as people, and when we fail to think of others in the same way today we can reach the same extremes.

    Oh yeah, definitely. This is a huge thing that the spread of information and the ease of communication has done for us, as long with ease of travel (so printing press, telegraph, telephone, airplane, internet, etc).

    When the people you are fighting are "those people over the hill who make funny noises out of their mouths and are different than us" it's pretty easy to be monstrous. As opposed to, "Oh, that island over there is Indonesia. A guy from there is in my WoW Guild and he has two cute kids."

    But yeah, I mean, people used to burn cats alive for entertainment and stuff.
    AoTsig_zps8cfd65c2.png
  • poshnialloposhniallo Registered User regular
    edited May 2013
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    It's hard coming up with warm ups using the passive voice for my students.

    It's a rather cumbersome sentence construction.

    Fill in the blanks?

    The ___ was ___

    Or just describing you doing something to an object?

    Like pick up a pencil

    "The pencil was picked up"

    Oh you sweet summer child. (I kid, I kid)

    The trick is finding something my students can do and would find interesting enough to actually do.

    The passive is just really inventions, discoveries, formal language, newspapers, and political deception.

    A guessing game on inventions? You could do it by name, nationality, or even year.

    Play Wits & Wagers Family (you can get the rules from BGG) with invention years. That's good for young people, who are often unaware of the passage of history, but are too uninformed to talk about specific individuals.

    E.g. What year was the TV invented in? Students write down a year (in teams). You put their answers up in the board. Students guess which is closest without going over the true answer. And then bet their tokens/meeples on the answer they think is correct.
    poshniallo on
    Neal Stephenson wrote:
    It was, of course, nothing more than sexism, the especially virulent type espoused by male techies who sincerely believe that they are too smart to be sexists.
  • WinkyWinky Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    Echo wrote: »
    There's a special brand of "but I'm too intelligent to be misogynistic!" misogynism.

    neal stephenson too smart to be sexist snow crash etc etc etc

    I had the quote in my head but I couldn't come up with the source.
    vspgsp.jpg
  • ShivahnShivahn Registered User regular
    Cinders wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    It's hard coming up with warm ups using the passive voice for my students.

    It's a rather cumbersome sentence construction.

    Fill in the blanks?

    The ___ was ___

    Or just describing you doing something to an object?

    Like pick up a pencil

    "The pencil was picked up"

    Oh you sweet summer child. (I kid, I kid)

    The trick is finding something my students can do and would find interesting enough to actually do.

    I have a confession.

    I am not actually a teacher type person.

    I am going to die when I TA this year.

    Just bring a whip to class.

    This is a good plan.

    It is up there with "hire a body double" and "kill self, teach as ghost who does not know fear"
  • EchoEcho Per Aspera Ad Inferi Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    Oh yeah, it's from Snow Crash. Always liked that quote.

    "It was, of course, nothing more than sexism, the especially virulent type espoused by male techies who sincerely believe that they are too smart to be sexists."
  • JacobkoshJacobkosh Gamble a stamp! I can show you how to be a real man!Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    Feral wrote: »
    Feral wrote: »
    Feral wrote: »
    And that the issue wasn't the concept of copyright in of itself, but that it was bound to censorship.

    heh

    lol

    So, you think it's going to be a good thing when Google can take your pictures from Picasa and use them as they want without recompense?

    I don't have pictures on Picasa. Do you prefer Nikon or Canon cameras? I mean, since we're jumping around asking each other tangentially-related questions. :P

    As Echo pointed out, copyright is censorship; just a legitimate form of it.

    No, copyright isn't censorship, unless you stretch the meaning of censorship out to meaninglessness. A book, song, movie, etc. isn't an idea.

    tumblr_lvv4jvx4xj1qemoij.png

    i don't really see how this helps anything

    copyright horseshit goes into its own thread now or it stops. i am desperately tired of hedgie and echo and everyone else fencing about it in here.

    well, i say fencing, but that suggests an elegance that isn't actually at all present
  • ShivahnShivahn Registered User regular
    I am slightly completely terrified of TAing.
This discussion has been closed.